There are two related principals behind the camouflage painting of military vehicles. The first is to conceal the vehicle from enemy observation. In this case, a combination of matt finish paintwork, nets and natural materials are used. But if total concealment is not possible, a combination of light and dark tones of paint are applied in such a way as to obscure the shape of the vehicle and disguise it's outline.
Webmaster's Note:
Much of the grunt work on this topic was done by
Mick Starmer, Mike Cooper and Micheal Hodges of the
Model Armoured Fighting Vehicle Association
From:
Army Engineering Design Branch
Vehicle Development Record
Ottawa, 1946
Volume 1
Painting
In the initial stages the specifications
for paint were based on those developed by the British War Office.
From time to time, modifications have been made to the specifications to
suit manufacturing conditions in Canada although the basic requirements
laid down by the British War Office were retained.
Those basic requirements were-
1. That the finish must be ‘matte’ to decrease the amount of reflection from the sun or lights which reduced the tendency to reveal the vehicle’s location.
2. That the finish must be gas decontaminable and gas resistant. This requirement was to prevent blistering of the paint of a vehicle which had been subjected to an enemy gas attack and also that the surface could be cleansed from the gas itself otherwise it would be deterimental to personnel of the vehicle who might come in contact with it.
3. Certain restrictions were laid down as to the precentage of lead compounds paticularly for the paint used for the interior of ‘closed type’ armoured vehicles. This to reduce the hazards from lead poisoning when, due to impingment of explosives, particles might flake off and be absorbed by the occupants
The paint applied by the Vehicle Manufacturer was considered the basic colour on top of which the Army could apply the camouflage disruptive colour.
Due to the pooling of vehicles, and the difficulty in determining in production their ultimate destination, it was decided later, to paint all vehicles the one colour in production and , where necessary, the Army would repaint with the colour required in any particular theatre of war.
At one stage the British Ministry of Supply
requested that all vehicles going to the Middle East be camouflaged.
However, it proved impractical to carry this out in production as proper
camouflaging required a continuitiy of design and a variation from vehicle
to vehicle to prevent a ‘stereotyped’ appearance. It was impossible
for the manufacturer to produce a continuity of design in production where,
in many instances, the chassis and cabs were not matched untill arrival
at destination.
The Canadian Army followed British Army practices fairly closely when
it came to vehicle camouflage colours and patterns. The British colours
and patterns were laid down in Army Council Instructions (ACI) and Military
Training Pamphlets (MTP). These were reflected in most cases in Canadian
Army Routine Orders (CARO). While definitive proof has still to be
uncovered, it seems that MTP 20 of June 1939 was followed by the Canadian
Army. This called for a horizontal/diagonal patterns of two
greens: Khaki Green G3 ( No.23 Middle Bronze Green)
and Light Green No.5 (Light Bronze Green).
At some as yet undiscovered time shortly hererafter, the British (and
the Canadians) replaced Light Green No.5 with a colour known as Nobel's
Dark Tarmac No.4. To the best of our knowledge in 2002, the colour
is best described as a dark, muddy gray.
Follows is the first Canadian reference to vehicle painting and camouflage.
Canadian Army Routine Orders (Overseas)
CMHQ London
14 October 1941
1121 - DISRUPTIVE PAINTING OF CANVAS COVERS AND HOODS OF VEHICLES
1. As paint, spraying, khaki green, No.3 and paint, spraying, dark tarmac No.4 have injurious effect on canvas covers and hoods of vehicles, the use of these paints for disruptive painting of vehicle covers and hoods will be discontinued forthwith.
2. In future, the following paints will be used for the disruptive painting of canvas covers and hoods of vehicles, and demands will be submitted as necessary through the D.A.D.O.S. of the formation to the Canadian Stores Depot, Crookham.
Catalogue
No.
Section H-1
HA
Paint, camouflage, bituminous emulsion
6188
Standard Colour No.1A
6179
Standard Colour No.7
3. The bodies of vehicles will continue to be painted with paint, spraying, khaki green, No.3 and paint, spraying, dark tarmac No.4
4. Military Training Pamphlet No.20 - "Camouflage - Distruptive Painting of Vehicles, 1939" - will be amended in due course.
Yes, it DOES look odd.
A truck painted green and grey carrying a tarp painted a different
shade of green and very dark brown. But it was done, at least till
the next change in orders.
By this time, the British had come up with a series of Standard Camouflage
Colours. Like all major changes in the Army, these were introduced
gradually at first suplimenting Greens G3 and G5 then replacing them. They
were produced in enamel for painting wood and metal and bituminous emulsion
for canvas Its interesting that all had an official number but only one,
SCC 15, had an 'official' name.
STANDARD CAMOUFLAGE COLOURS
SCC1a - "Very Dark Brown"
SCC2 - 'Dark Brown' / "Service Colour" / 'Service
Drab'
SCC4 - 'Dark Earth' (NOT the RAF colour)
SCC5 - "Light Mud"
SCC7 - 'Dark Olive Green'
SCC11b 'Desert Pink'
SCC13 - "Jungle Green"
SCC14 - "Black";'Charcoal'
SCC15 - Olive Drab